Au contraire, i'd say the
lack of evidence to support your assumptions is a very strong fact to support my case. It's very simple really when you think about it -- Omni-Tek was under close scrutiny of ICC due to its earlier handling of the clan issue. And there was also the infamous Sol Banking, staying close and itching to get their hands on the piece of notum pie with a slightest pretext.
If there was
any incidents originated by Omni-Tek, you can bet the clans would scream foul the very minute it happened, as that'd give them immediate backing of ICC and strong corporation to support their case ... and net them even more privileges they'd already gotten. That there's no records of such, including the ICC's and clans' own records, can only mean one of two things:
* that either Omni-Tek was smart and played things clean... and given the handling of neutrals and the Jobe which took place during that time it seems most likely. Thus there was no incidents of such nature, and the mine bombing was unprovoked (in the sense no objective 3rd part would support such cause)
* or that there actually was some incidents. But instead of filling the complaint with ICC about them and taking legal route like any sensible person, your affiliates preferred to blow up innocent people... which, am sorry to say, is a clear sign of sociopathy and can't be defended in any reasonable manner. (nor is for that matter an unprovoked attack in the first listed case...)